On Food Insecurity and Productivity
Abstract
More
than 50 million Americans suffer from food insecurity, an issue arising from
the growing economic chasm between rich and poor. Food insecurity can
ultimately result in many disadvantages for children, men, and women in
education, developing their habits, food preferences, and even sleep.
Therefore, the ability of Americans to acquire sustainable, healthy food
indicates the differences between the wealthy and poor in a variety of ways.
Thus, I write to share the profound impacts of food insecurity, the differences
between the rich and poor that it represents, and how Americans should
interpret this information.
On Food Insecurity and Productivity
Sitting on the
carpet of an apartment in a poverty-ridden neighborhood in the Bronx, a child
in a family of six sits, stares at the pantry, walks over to it with his
stomach growling, and opens the door. Inside lay five empty shelves with
nothing more than a bag half-full of stale chips that expired three years prior
and a can of green beans. The child, like many others in the neighborhood, does
not know when the next meal could arrive or what it might look like. Sadly,
nearly 15 million more children in the United States live in this same
condition: inadequate nourishment.
Food
insecurity, similar to malnourishment in the United States has become an
increasingly pressing issue as women, men, and children across the country are
suffering from the increasing disparity of income between America’s rich and
poor. This gap provokes many negative outcomes regarding food insecurity. Thus,
denoting a correlation, food insecurity often indicates a disparity between
rich and poor, regarding socioeconomic status, differing food preferences,
education levels, and habit choices.
The lack of
food security in many households has indicated a polar shift in economic
resources between those who are and are not food secure. One study from the
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion illustrates this very well.
Households facing unemployment or low income bear the load of food insecurity
as an effect of not being able to have access to readily available foods. 31.6
% of households with low income levels were food insecure, while the nation’s
food insecurity levels were substantially less (Office of Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion, n.d., para. 3). This indicates that a negative correlation
exists between income and food insecurity levels, denoting that as income
levels decrease, food insecurity levels increase and vice versa.
In addition to
an economic disparity being indicated from food insecurity, rich and poor
Americans also have very different food preferences as an additional result.
Anna Vlasits (2016) claims that low income families eat very poorly, while high
income families eat very healthy. Over the past two decades, neither rich nor
poor have increased the amount of vegetables they eat in America; however,
wealthy Americans have already and continue to eat more healthy vegetables than
poorer families. In the fruit category, the lower end of the income spectrum
did not improve within the period between 1999 and 2012, while the wealthy
improved significantly, consuming more real fruits and replacing sugary fruit
juices. Both groups increased their consumption of whole grains; however, the
gap still remains with wealthier citizens eating more whole grains than lower
income citizens. In contrast, only wealthy Americans increased their
consumption of nuts and seeds. Yet, poor Americans consumed nearly twice as
many soft drinks as their economic counterparts (para. 11). In addition to
this, media has been targeting poor Americans as victims of food insecurity and
relentlessly cheaper, unhealthier foods as viable options of consumption,
provoking them to waste more money on less, non-nutritionally valuable food. This
media, in an additional fight, urges consumers to believe the false notion that
healthier products ultimately cost more when, most times, they do not,
furthering the differences in food preferences between Americans.
The inability
to acquire food has also spawned very different education levels between
America’s poor and rich. Deeds (2015) writes that mental health problems,
hospitalizations, and a poorer quality of life are prevalent with the food
insecure. Not only do these ailments take time away from school, but they also
can heavily weaken immunity to future diseases, viruses, and infections, taking
more time from the education of the malnourished. Moreover, children in food
insecure homes are more likely to flunk, not show up to school, and show less
significant progress in math and reading (Deeds). Therefore, because of the
lack of nutrition and daily vitamins and minerals that food insecure families
are not obtaining, they are at a severe disadvantage in school. Also, school
provides the primary building blocks necessary to succeed in the labor force.
Thus, if 50 million food insecure Americans are lacking these building blocks,
then success in the work force is also unlikely.
A lack of
nutritionally valuable food also leads to harmful biological, psychological,
and physical effects. When deprived of necessary nutrients, the body harmfully
feeds off of its own bi-products including glucose, fat, and protein.
Subsequently, hunger, a lack of focus, and fatigue set in. Because of these
psychological effects, food insecure Americans, who are in school, lie at a
major disadvantage in retaining educational curriculum. Not only this, but they
also become easily exhausted from assignments, fall asleep during classes, and
do not follow valuable instructions. Consequently, many food insecure students
receive below passing grades, fail classes, or even fail to find a purpose for
showing up to class simply because of a lack of food.
Different food
habits are also a highly significant effect of food security and insecurity.
Having witnessed the differences between rich and poor American’s eating habits
due to a varying level of food security, many of these habits have grown to
encompass wealthy citizens eating with several sets of cutlery, while poor
Americans often eat food with simply a single utensil or their hands. In
addition, wealthy citizens are more likely to possess a variety of food for
consumption. Take for instance the previously mentioned child in the Bronx.
Although he might have only a bag of chips and a can of vegetables, a child in
upstate Manhattan might have 100 times the variety of food. Therefore, economic
differences, spurring different levels of food security, can equally alter the
habits Americans take part in in the presence of food.
Food insecurity
leads to overeating when the opportunity arises. Poor children, who go to
school, ask for food from other students, making up for a deficit in their diet
of meager portions. When food insecure Americans go to food gatherings in the
community or at local churches, they take as much as possible, leaving their
hunger idle until the servings run out.
On the opposite
side of the spectrum however, rich citizens do not have to worry where or when
their next meal will come from. Moreover, having a wider variety of food allows
them to develop their taste, ultimately expanding their pallet. This diversity
in the pantry allows them to cook and experiment with a greater variety of not
only tastes, but nutrition as well. The food secure, wealthy Americans are able
to have greater freedom regarding what they eat, how they eat, and how they can
make their food work in their favor. In addition, the upper-class citizenry has
the funds capable of purchasing the higher quality, more expensive, and,
mostly, healthier food options, allowing this group to maintain its mental,
emotional, and physical well-being.
Moreover, upper-class Americans
are able to buy in bulk for natural disasters, food shortages, and even
leisure. Because of this, they never worry about their next meal, allowing
themselves to be able to think about their dreams and aspirations. Their
ability to buy more food at once reduces their anxiety about future meals,
travel time and money commuting back and forth to the grocery store, and the
cost per item on which they spend. As a result, modern day aristocrats have
their mind at ease when regarding food.
This ease can
also turn into wastefulness though. In contrast to many lower-class Americans,
the rich waste substantially more food than the poor. The poor, who have to
save every crumb they buy, cannot afford (monetarily nor biologically) to waste
food. In contrast, the wealthy have food to spare, so throwing away the extras
they do not eat will not hurt them.
Another disparity also exists
within the realm of sleep. Sleeping while on an empty stomach can contribute to
a host of problems that many economically sound individuals do not have to
worry about. For instance, sleeping while hungry can cause sleep deprivation
and disturb natural sleep cycles, making for a bad night’s rest. Additionally,
a lack of sleep can fail to allow muscle proteins to consolidate. When sleep
lacks, immunity against diseases and illnesses can wane as well. Furthermore,
when sleep lacks due to hunger, the metabolism of Americans with food
insecurity can be lowered. Not only can metabolism be lowered, but immunity for
diseases including diabetes and obesity, due to the loss in metabolism, can
also be hindered greatly. Hunger pains can also keep brain activity on high
alert. This indicates yet another disparity that arises concerning food
insecurity: sleep. When a food shortage arises, sleep can lack. However, when a
surplus of food exists, sleep and memory consolidation thrive.
Malnourishment
and food insecurity can cause great disadvantages to American citizens who
cannot acquire enough food for their families, leaving men, women, and the
child in the Bronx to starve, further prohibiting them from educating
themselves, developing their socioeconomic status and their habit choices, and accentuating
their food preferences. In effect, 50 million Americans are being left to
suffer in school, in the choices they make, and in the variety of food they
provide themselves with…all as a result of food insecurity.
References
Deeds, C. (2015, August 24). Food for thought: how food insecurity
affects a child’s education [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.aypf.org/blog/food-for-thought-how-food-insecurity-affects-a-childs-education/
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
(n.d.). Food insecurity.
Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Taste of Home. (n.d.). Food. Print Advertisement. Retrieved from https://www.tasteofhome.com/recipes/barbecued-burgers/
Vlasits, A. (2016, June 21). The growing diet divide between rich and
poor in America. Statnews.com. Retrieved November 22, 2019, from https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/21/growing-diet-divide/

Comments
Post a Comment